well, now it makes sense, doesn't it?
Jan. 30th, 2004 04:09 pm"In this culture, gender attribution, like gender assignment, is phallocentric. That is, one is male until perceived otherwise. According to a study done by Kessler and McKenna, one can extrapolate that it would take the presence of nearly four female cues to outweigh the presence of one male cue; one is assumed male until proven otherwise. That's one reason why many women today get 'sirred' whereas very few men get called 'ma'am.'"
(-kate bornstein)
Which explains why that dude called me sir last night when I paid for my Bass. Jesus H. Christ.
It's not that it bothers me per se when people mistake me for a boy; in fact, that doesn't bother me. What *does* bother me is that people don't seem to have any fine-tuned sense of gender...My tits weren't visible (thanks to my oh-so unfashionable parka) and I've got short hair and so therefore I'm "Sir?"
"One is assumed male until proven otherwise." Well, here's to have no subject-hood in patriarchy! Cheers.
(-kate bornstein)
Which explains why that dude called me sir last night when I paid for my Bass. Jesus H. Christ.
It's not that it bothers me per se when people mistake me for a boy; in fact, that doesn't bother me. What *does* bother me is that people don't seem to have any fine-tuned sense of gender...My tits weren't visible (thanks to my oh-so unfashionable parka) and I've got short hair and so therefore I'm "Sir?"
"One is assumed male until proven otherwise." Well, here's to have no subject-hood in patriarchy! Cheers.