well, i'll be.
Dec. 6th, 2004 06:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
starfrostinghaha, oh my:
and color-coordinated and everything. :sigh:
also, here's what's to be had of my paper Feminist interventions towards a multiple subject invoke desire, conjuring the erotic as a force capable of disrupting instrumental accounts of an organicized, unitary body. This is a promising project, but what might this diffracted, multiple subjectivity mean for queer bodies? As non-normative bodily egos persist ever so precariously in the face of the ‘obvious’ truth of naturalized binary gender, they engage in potential and just-barely possible transformative embodiments. Certainly, a sense of self dissonant with prevailing norms of bodily meaning interrupts these regulatory mechanisms, even as its survival is threatened by the pervasive heteronormative logic of corporeal intentionality. The potential opened up by an emphasis on desire as subversive of this fixed instrumentality is invaluable in cutting the (supposedly causal) cords between the naming, meaning, and use of body parts. However, the question of what this ‘I’ is becoming needs to be refined by an interrogation of how desire might sustain the self as the bodyis reorganized and reimagined. as of now. It's just the intro, unfinished as of yet. In real life it begins w/2 rather brilliant quotes, one by Grosz and another by Butler. i need a cigarette like you wouldn't believe, but I've only got 11 more pages (of this one) to go!
| daddy/boy is love | |||||
| brought to you by the isLove Generator | |||||
and color-coordinated and everything. :sigh:
also, here's what's to be had of my paper Feminist interventions towards a multiple subject invoke desire, conjuring the erotic as a force capable of disrupting instrumental accounts of an organicized, unitary body. This is a promising project, but what might this diffracted, multiple subjectivity mean for queer bodies? As non-normative bodily egos persist ever so precariously in the face of the ‘obvious’ truth of naturalized binary gender, they engage in potential and just-barely possible transformative embodiments. Certainly, a sense of self dissonant with prevailing norms of bodily meaning interrupts these regulatory mechanisms, even as its survival is threatened by the pervasive heteronormative logic of corporeal intentionality. The potential opened up by an emphasis on desire as subversive of this fixed instrumentality is invaluable in cutting the (supposedly causal) cords between the naming, meaning, and use of body parts. However, the question of what this ‘I’ is becoming needs to be refined by an interrogation of how desire might sustain the self as the bodyis reorganized and reimagined. as of now. It's just the intro, unfinished as of yet. In real life it begins w/2 rather brilliant quotes, one by Grosz and another by Butler. i need a cigarette like you wouldn't believe, but I've only got 11 more pages (of this one) to go!
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
mmm paper.
Date: 2004-12-07 04:56 pm (UTC)